
Could a Rule Meant to Protect Remote Monitoring End Up Weakening Connected Care?
CMS is right to target opaque, low-value remote monitoring. But employment status alone may not solve the accountability problem.
Fee-for-service vs. value-based care, what's the difference, and how can you position your practice to succeed in both worlds?
Hoss Care Team
Healthcare Insights

Healthcare is shifting from volume to value. While fee-for-service still dominates, value-based payment models are growing rapidly. Understanding this landscape is essential for practice managers planning for the future.
Fee-for-Service (FFS): The traditional model. Providers bill for each service delivered, office visits, procedures, tests. More services = more revenue. There's little incentive to coordinate care or keep patients healthy between visits.
Value-Based Care (VBC): Payment tied to outcomes and quality. Providers may receive bonuses for meeting quality metrics, shared savings from reducing total cost of care, or capitated payments for managing a population. Better outcomes = more revenue.
Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs): Groups of providers who share responsibility for a patient population. Medicare's MSSP program is the largest example.
Bundled Payments: Single payment for an episode of care (like a knee replacement), covering all providers and services.
Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMH): Primary care practices that meet certain care coordination and quality standards receive enhanced payments.
Quality Bonus Programs: Pay-for-performance programs that reward achievement on quality measures.
Value-based contracts typically measure preventive care (vaccinations, screenings), chronic disease management (A1C control, blood pressure control), patient experience (satisfaction surveys), care coordination (transitions, referrals), and utilization (ER visits, hospitalizations, readmissions).
Understanding which metrics are in your contracts, and how you're performing, is essential.
Success in value-based care requires strong primary care relationships, proactive chronic disease management, care coordination infrastructure, data analytics capabilities, and patient engagement tools.
Programs like chronic care management and remote patient monitoring directly support these capabilities while generating FFS revenue today. They're bridge strategies that prepare you for value-based success.
Most practices will operate in a hybrid environment for years to come, some FFS patients, some value-based contracts. The key is building capabilities that work in both models while positioning for the inevitable shift toward value.
Hoss Care's value-based care programs help practices succeed in this hybrid environment, generating immediate revenue while building the infrastructure for value-based success.
See how Hoss Care can help you implement these strategies in your practice.
Book a demoExplore the Value-Based Care programs
CMS is right to target opaque, low-value remote monitoring. But employment status alone may not solve the accountability problem.

Learn when remote clinical staffing can extend care teams, support RPM and CCM workflows, and preserve continuity as patient volume grows.

Multiple chronic conditions do not pause between visits. Learn how structured care helps teams support complex patients at home.